Monthly Disciplinary Actions - August 2009

NYSE AMEX DISCIPLINARY ACTION
AMEX Specialist Firms Disciplined
Bear Wagner Specialists, L.L.C., Bear Hunter Structured Products, L.L.C., and HBH Specialists, L.L.C.
Hearing Board Decision: 09-AMEX-14-16
12 Aug 2009
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Bear Wagner Specialists, L.L.C., Bear Hunter Structured Products, L.L.C., and HBH Specialists, L.L.C.: Violated Amex Rule 155, made applicable to options through Amex Rule 950, by failing to give precedence to orders entrusted to them as agent in multiple options before executing at same price purchases or sales in multiple options for accounts in which they had interest; violated Amex Rule 155 by failing to give precedence to orders entrusted to them as agent in multiple equities before executing at same price purchases or sales in multiple equities for accounts in which they had interest; violated Amex Rule 231(e) and Regulation NMS 602(b)(2) by failing to honor published quotation, by failing to execute equity orders upon presentment or by executing these orders at prices inferior to published quoted market; violated Amex Rule 16 by failing to adhere to principles of good business practices in handling of market orders, by failing to execute orders in timely manner; violated Regulation NMS 604 by failing to immediately display customer equity limit orders in public quotation, when each such order was at price that would improve specialist’s bid or offer in each such security, or when order was priced equal to specialist’s bid or offer and national best bid or offer for each such security, and size of order represents more than de minimis change in relation to size associated with specialist’s bid or offer in each such security; violated AMEX Rule 232 by failing to issue required ITS pre-opening notifications in eligible securities to other participant markets and/or setting an opening price range that straddled previous day’s closing price; violated Amex Rule 16 by failing to post closing prints within 180 seconds of close in product for which it specialized, in contradiction to principles of good business practice; violated Amex Rule 16 by failing to adhere to principles of good business practice in conduct of their affairs, by disseminating quote that locked or crossed quoted market of another ITS participant and then failing to promptly unlock or uncross ITS participant’s market; violated Amex Rules 128A-AEMI (g) and 16 by failing to pair off remaining imbalances within ten seconds in order to re-enable Auto-Ex when a buy or sell imbalance had locked or crossed the AEMI Book and Auto-Ex had been disabled.  Consent to censure and $125,000 joint and several fine.
Case Summary
Bear Wagner Specialists, L.L.C., Bear Hunter Structured Products, L.L.C., and HBH Specialists, L.L.C., former member firms, consented without admitting or denying guilt to trading violations.
  • An NYSE Hearing Officer found that from January 2003 through May 2005, Bear Wagner Specialists, L.L.C., Bear Hunter Structured Products, L.L.C., and HBH Specialists, L.L.C. (the “Bear Firms”) violated Amex Rule 155, made applicable to options through Amex Rule 950, by failing to give precedence to orders entrusted to them as agent in multiple options before executing at same price purchases or sales in multiple options for accounts in which they had interest, and from March 2005 through February 2007, the Bear Firms violated Amex Rule 155 by failing to give precedence to orders entrusted to them as agent in multiple equities before executing at same price purchases or sales in multiple equities for accounts in which they had interest.  In addition, on various occasions between September 2005 through February 2008, the Bear Firms committed various order handling violations by failing to honor the published quotation, failing to execute orders on presentment or executing orders at prices inferior to the published quoted market, failing to execute market orders in a timely manner, failing to immediately display customer equity limit orders that would improve the specialist’s bid or offer, failing to post closing prints within 180 seconds of the close in product for which they specialized, failing to issue required ITS pre-opening notifications and/or setting an opening price range that straddled previous day’s closing price, disseminating a quote that locked or crossed the quoted market of another ITS participant and then failing to promptly unlock or uncross the ITS participant’s market, and failing to pair off remaining imbalances within ten seconds in order to re-enable Auto-Ex when a buy or sell imbalance had locked or crossed the AEMI Book and Auto-Ex had been disabled.

The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure and a joint and several fine of $125,000.  The respondents consented to the penalties.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
NYSE AMEX DISCIPLINARY ACTION
AMEX Firm Disciplined
CTC, LLC
Hearing Board Decision: 09-AMEX-17
12 Aug 2009
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated Amex Rule 155 (made applicable to options by Amex Rule 950) by failing to give precedence to orders entrusted to it as agent in an option product before executing at the same price purchases or sales in that option product for accounts in which the Firm had interest   – Consent to censure and $12,000 fine.
Case Summary
CTC, LLC of Chicago, Ill., a member firm, consented without admitting or denying guilt to options trading violations.
  • An NYSE Amex hearing officer found that from March 1, 2004 through Nov. 30, 2004, Dec. 1, 2004 through Feb. 28, 2005, and March 1, 2005 through May 31, 2005 (collectively, the “Relevant Periods”), on certain occasions, CTC violated its agency obligations by failing to give precedence to options orders entrusted to it.  Orders were transmitted to the Floor of the Amex electronically through the Amex Options Display Book (“AODB”) electronic options trading platform, and entrusted to CTC as agent.  As described more fully below, on certain occasions during the Relevant Periods, CTC executed transactions in an option product of which it was registered or for accounts in which it had an interest before executing at the same price any purchase or sale in the same option product for accounts in which it was entrusted as agent.

NYSE Amex imposed a penalty of a censure and $12,000 fine.  CTC, LLC consented to the penalty.

 

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Member Firm Disciplined for Trading Violations
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
Hearing Board Decision: 09-NYSE-14
12 Aug 2009
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated NYSE Rule 92(a) by entering order to buy (sell) NYSE-listed security while knowingly in possession of customer order to buy (sell) such security, which could have been executed at same price; violated NYSE Rule 401 by failing to conduct business affairs in accordance with principles of good business practice by failing to adequately document customer’s permission to trade along or ahead of customer’s order executed pursuant to NYSE Rule 92(b); violated NYSE Rule 123C by failing to comply with requirements governing entry and cancellation of MOC and LOC orders; violated NYSE Rule 476(a)(8) by entering orders for purchase and sale of securities, execution of which involved no change of beneficial ownership; violated NYSE Rule 476(a)(10) by submitting inaccurate Daily Program Trade Reports to NYSE; violated NYSE Rule 132.30 by failing to submit accurate account type indicator; violated NYSE Rule 134(d)(v) by processing trades through Floor error account when such trades were not related to bona fide errors; violated NYSE Rule 411(a) by failing to rescind erroneous report when required to do so; violated NYSE Rule 342 by failing to reasonably supervise and implement adequate controls, including separate system of follow-up and review, reasonably designed to achieve compliance with NYSE rules and policies pertaining to: (a) transmission and execution of certain proprietary and agency trades on NYSE; (b) documentation of customers’ permission to trade alongside or ahead of customers’ orders; (c) processing and documentation of error account transactions and erroneous reports; and (d) filing of accurate DPTRs – Consent to censure and $175,000 fine.

 

Case Summary
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. of New York, N.Y., a member firm, consented without admitting or denying guilt to trading violations. 
  • An NYSE hearing officer found that on five occasions from January 2005 through December 2006, J.P. Morgan violated NYSE Rule 92(a) by entering proprietary trades ahead of or alongside customer orders without obtaining customer permission or without a trading exception in NYSE Rule 92(b) being available.  On four occasions during the same period, the Firm violated NYSE Rule 401 by failing to document customer consent to trade ahead of or alongside customers’ orders.
  • In addition, from 2006 through 2008, the Firm violated NYSE Rules 132.30, 134(d)(v), and 411(a) with respect to its handling and reporting of certain error transactions and erroneous reports in that it failed to rescind such erroneous reports, and instead honored the erroneous reports, using the Firm’s error account, though the trades were not related to bona fide errors.  During this same period, the Firm violated NYSE Rule 123C by entering and cancelling Market-on-Close (“MOC”) and Limit-on-Close (“LOC”) orders after the prescribed cut-off times.  It also executed a purchase and sale of securities that involved no beneficial change in ownership, thereby violating NYSE Rule 476(a)(8).  In addition, the Firm filed inaccurate DPTRs with the NYSE in violation of NYSE Rule 476(a)(10).  Finally, J.P. Morgan violated NYSE Rule 342 by failing to have appropriate procedures for supervision and control of its activities to ensure compliance with securities laws and regulations, and by failing to have adequate systems of follow-up and review to determine that it exercised its supervisory responsibilities properly, with respect to compliance with NYSE Rules 92, 134(d), 411(a), and 476(a)(10).

The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure and $175,000 fine.  J.P. Morgan consented to the penalty.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
NYSE AMEX DISCIPLINARY ACTION
Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C. Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Violations of Regulation SHO Short
Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C.
Hearing Board Decision: 09-AMEX-21-22
05 Aug 2009
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated Rule 203(b)(1) of Regulation SHO in that Respondents, who were not acting as bona fide options market makers, improperly utilized the Regulation SHO market maker locate exemption to avoid locating shares prior to effecting short sale transactions in Regulation SHO threshold securities; violated Rule 203(b)(3) of Regulation SHO in that Respondents engaged in a series of transactions that circumvented Respondents’ delivery obligations in Regulation SHO threshold securities that had been allocated to Respondents by clearing firm; violated AMEX Rule 958 – ANTE in that Respondents failed to meet their in-person, on-floor, and quoting obligations; violated AMEX Rule 958-ANTE(b) in that Respondents entered into numerous transactions that were not reasonably calculated to maintenance of fair and orderly market – Consent to censure, $1,500,000 joint and several disgorgement, $500,000 joint and several fine, and seven- year bar against Hazan.
Case Summary
See NYSE News Release Dated August 5, 2009
 
Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C. Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Violations of Regulation SHO Short Sale Rules

-- Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C. to Pay $4 Million, Including $3 Million Disgorgement; Steven Moses Hazan to Be Barred For Seven Years --


 
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
NYSE ARCA OPTIONS DISCIPLINARY ACTION
Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C. Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Violations of Regulation SHO Short
Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C.
Hearing Board Decision: 09-ARCA-05-06
05 Aug 2009
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated Rule 203(b)(1) of Regulation SHO in that Respondents, who were not acting as bona fide options market makers, improperly utilized Regulation SHO market maker locate exemption to avoid locating shares prior to effecting short sale transactions in Regulation SHO threshold securities; violated Rule 203(b)(3) of Regulation SHO in that Respondents engaged in a series of transactions that circumvented Respondents’ delivery obligations in Regulation SHO threshold securities that had been allocated to Respondents by clearing firm; violated NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.37A in that Respondents entered into numerous transactions that were not reasonably calculated to maintenance of fair and orderly market; violated NYSE Arca Options Rule 6.37B(c) in that Respondents failed to provide   continuous two-sided quotation in their appointed issues for 60% of time NYSE Arca, Inc. was open for trading – Consent to censure, $1,500,000 joint and several disgorgement, $500,000 joint and several fine, and seven-year bar against Hazan.
Case Summary
See August 5, 2009 News Release
 
 
Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C. Settle Enforcement Actions Involving Violations of Regulation SHO Short Sale Rules

-- Steven Moses Hazan and Hazan Capital Management, L.L.C. to Pay $4 Million, Including $3 Million Disgorgement; Steven Moses Hazan to Be Barred For Seven Years --


View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back