|
|
Monthly Disciplinary Actions - March 2008
|
Former Specialist Fined and Barred
Michael Joseph Hayward
Hearing Board Decision: 08-002
12 Mar 2008
|
| Summary |
Back to Top |
| Case Note |
| Violated Section 10(b) of Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by knowingly or recklessly (i) employing device, scheme or artifice to defraud and (ii) engaging in acts, practices, and course of business which operated to defraud customers in connection with purchase or sale of securities by engaging in Interpositioning and Trading Ahead transactions; violated NYSE Rule 92 by effecting Interpositioning and Trading Ahead transactions in certain securities for Firm’s dealer account while there were unexecuted customer orders to buy (or sell) such securities which could have been executed at same price; violated NYSE Rule 104 by effecting trades for Firm’s dealer account that were not reasonably necessary to maintain fair and orderly market, and failed to effectively represent and execute agency orders entrusted to him; violated NYSE Rule 123B(d) by failing to execute certain customer orders in accordance with NYSE auction market rules and procedures, including requirements to cross and execute customer orders against each other before buying or selling for Firm’s dealer account; violated NYSE Rule 476(a)(6), NYSE Rule 476(a)(7), and NYSE Rule 401(a) by engaging in Interpositioning and Trading Ahead transactions. Consent to censure, $165,165.39 fine, and permanent bar.
|
|
| Case Summary |
Michael Joseph Hayward of Ramsey, New Jersey, a former specialist, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of trading violations and failing to maintain a fair and orderly market.
-
An NYSE hearing officer found that on thousands of occasions during the relevant period, Hayward knowingly or recklessly engaged in fraudulent trading on the Floor of the NYSE and violated his fundamental agency obligations as a specialist to hold the interest of public customer orders entrusted to him above the proprietary interests of his member Firm and himself, and to match executable customer orders. The public customer orders were transmitted to the Floor of the NYSE electronically. Instead of pairing buy and sell orders, Hayward intentionally “interpositioned” the Firm’s dealer account between those orders or intentionally “traded ahead” of orders on one side of the market. In either case, Hayward disadvantaged customer orders.
The NYSE imposed the penalty of a censure, $165,165.39 fine, and permanent bar. Payment of the fine shall be made to the SEC only pursuant to an SEC Order. Hayward consented to the penalty.
|
|
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
|
|
Individual Disciplined for Sales Practice Violations
Robert Jonas Tart
Hearing Board Decision: 08-004
12 Mar 2008
|
| Summary |
Back to Top |
| Case Note |
| Violated NYSE Rule 476(a)(6) by mismarking order tickets to reflect that solicited trades were unsolicited and engaging in unauthorized trading in customer’s account; caused violation of Section 17(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 thereunder, and NYSE Rule 440 by causing employer to make and preserve inaccurate books and records; violated NYSE Rule 408(a) by accepting orders for customer’s account from person other than customer without first obtaining written authorization of customer. Consent to censure and five-month bar. |
|
| Case Summary |
Robert Jonas Tart of Sarasota, Florida, a former registered representative, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of sales practice violations.
- An NYSE hearing officer found that while employed as a registered representative at UBS, Tart serviced two individual trust accounts owned by customers IJ and AJ (collectively, the “Js”). The Js, an elderly married couple, also maintained an irrevocable charitable remainder trust account (“CRUT”) at the Firm and appointed a financial institution Trustee as the trustee. The Js gave Trustee authorization to make trading decisions in the CRUT.
-
Between 2004 and 2005, Tart mismarked order tickets for solicited orders as “unsolicited.” Additionally, Tart improperly accepted orders in the AJ account from IJ without first obtaining the written discretionary authority authorization of AJ. In 2005, Tart also engaged in unauthorized trading in the CRUT by liquidating and acquiring mutual fund positions, without first obtaining prior authorization from the trustee.
The NYSE imposed a penalty of censure and five-month bar. Tart consented to the penalty.
|
|
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
|
|
Member Firm Fined for Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering Program, Other Violations
Shields Capital Corp.
Hearing Board Decision: 08-005
12 Mar 2008
|
| Summary |
Back to Top |
| Case Note |
| Violated NYSE Rule 445 by failing to establish an adequate Anti-Money Laundering program by failing to conduct an independent test of its AML procedures, timely file a suspicious activity report, have its senior management approve its CIP procedures in writing, and have procedures for the independent testing of its AML program; violated Section 17 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 17a-4 thereunder and NYSE Rule 440 by failing to preserve electronic communications relating to its business in a non-rewritable, non-erasable format; violated NYSE Rule 472(k)(1) for issuing research reports that failed to include certain required disclosures or had inadequate disclosures; violated NYSE Rule 472(l) by failing to establish written supervisory procedures for the pre-approval and review of media appearances by Firm employees; violated NYSE Rule 401 by failing to monitor the internet for unauthorized use of its corporate name by Firm personnel, and have an independent person conduct the annual compliance examinations of the Firm’s New York branch office; violated NYSE Rules 405A(1), 405A(3) and 405A(4), respectively, by failing to provide customers with one or more documents containing sufficient disclosures regarding the Firm’s non-managed fee-based account program prior to the opening of accounts in that program, establish and maintain systems and procedures adequate to monitor and identify customers whose level of account activity may be inappropriate in the context of the Firm’s non-managed fee-based account program, and maintain written procedures for contacting and following-up with customers whose level of account activity may be inappropriate for the Firm’s non-managed fee-based account program; and violated NYSE Rule 342 and certain provisions thereunder by failing to establish and maintain appropriate procedures for supervision and control, including a system of follow-up and review with respect to media appearances by its employees, the retention and review of electronic communications, its non-managed fee-based account programs, and its supervision of a registered representative with an extensive history of customer complaints. Consent to censure, $82,500 fine, and an undertaking.
|
|
| Case Summary |
Shields Capital Corp. of New York, NY, a member firm, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of failing to establish an adequate AML program, among other violations.
-
An NYSE hearing officer found that Shields Capital Corp. violated: NYSE Rule 445 by failing to conduct an independent test of its Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”) program by failing to have a member of senior management approve in writing its Customer Identification Program, by failing to timely file a suspicious activity report, and by failing to have procedures for the independent testing of its AML program; NYSE Rule 472 by failing to establish written supervisory procedures for the review and pre-approval of media appearances by its employees and by issuing research reports without certain required disclosures or which had inadequate disclosures; Section 17 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rules 17a-4 thereunder and NYSE 440 by failing to preserve certain electronic communications; NYSE Rule 401 by failing to monitor the internet for unauthorized use of its corporate name by its employees and by failing to have an independent person conduct the annual compliance examinations of its New York branch office; NYSE Rule 405A by failing to provide customers in its non managed fee-based account programs with sufficient disclosures, by failing to establish and maintain systems and procedures to monitor and identify customer activity in these programs, and by failing to establish and maintain appropriate written procedures for these programs; the Firm also violated NYSE Rule 342 and certain provisions thereunder by failing to establish and maintain appropriate procedures for supervision and control, including a system of follow-up and review, with respect to (a) the firm’s non-managed fee-based account programs, (b) a registered representative with an extensive history of customer complaints, (c) media appearances by its employees, and (d) the retention and review of its employees electronic communications.
The NYSE imposed a penalty of censure, $82,500 fine and an undertaking. Shields Capital Corp. consented to the penalty.
|
|
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
|
|
NYSE ARCA EQUITIES DISCIPLINARY ACTION
Equity Trading Permit Holder Disciplined for Failure to Maintain Two-Sided Orders
CRT Capital Group LLC
Hearing Board Decision: 06-AE-21
12 Mar 2008
|
| Summary |
Back to Top |
| Case Note |
| Violated NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.23(a)(1) in that on five trading days in December 2005, CRT Capital Group, LLC failed to maintain continuous, two-sided Q orders on the NYSE Arca Marketplace in the security in which CRT was a registered Market Maker. Consent to a censure and a $2,500 fine.
|
|
| Case Summary |
CRT Capital Group, LLC, of Stamford, Connecticut, a Equity Trading Permit Holder of NYSE Arca registered to transact business on the NYSE Arca Marketplace in accordance with NYSE Arca Equities rules, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings that it violated its obligations as a Market Maker.
-
On five trading days in December 2005, CRT Capital Group, LLC inadvertently failed to maintain continuous, two-sided Q orders on the NYSE Arca Marketplace in the security in which CRT was a registered Market Maker.
The Office of the General Counsel of NYSE Arca Equities imposed the penalty of a censure and a $2,500 fine. CRT consented to the penalty. |
|
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
|
|
| |
|