Monthly Disciplinary Actions - February 2006

Firm Fined for Failure to Supervise its Handling of Customer Proxies
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Hearing Board Decision: 05-045
15 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
See In re Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Decision 05-045 (NYSE Feb. 2, 2006).
Case Summary
See attached News Release.
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
View related News Release
back
Firm Fined for Failure to Supervise Suspicious Accounts, Improper Communications During a Road Show and Trading Violations
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.
Hearing Board Decision: 05-163
09 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated NYSE Rule 80A by permitting agency index arbitrage basket orders to be executed without required “plus tick” notation when collar was in place; violated Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and NYSE Rule 440 by having books and records that did not reflect index arbitrage trading with specificity and failed to timely report index arbitrage trades; violated NYSE Rule 440B and Rule 10a-1 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by transmitting index arbitrage basket in which certain issues violated short sale rule; violated NYSE Rule 342 by failing to have adequate systems and written procedures regarding index arbitrage trading, trading collars, short sales and derivatives trading, to adequately supervise activities in customer’s accounts, and to detect and prevent research analyst’s videotaped appearance on Internet road show, sales literature, or similar communications from being made available to public without advance supervisory approval; violated NYSE Rule 405 by failing to: (a) use due diligence to learn essential facts relative to every customer and every order; and (b) diligently supervise all accounts handled by registered representative; violated Exchange Rule 472 by making available, to customers or public, sales literature or similar type of communications without prior supervisory approval and by utilizing communication in connection with investment banking transaction that was not fair and balanced – Consent to censure and $1.5 million fine.
Case Summary
See attached News Release.
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
View related News Release
back
Decision Reversed After Appeal
Gary E. Goulding
Hearing Board Decision: 05-051
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
See In re Gary E. Goulding Decision 05-051 (NYSE Jan. 5, 2006).
Case Summary
In June 2005, in the matter of  Gary E. Goulding of Visalia, GA, a registered representative, a hearing panel rejected a stipulated sanction of a censure and one-month suspension. Without admitting or denying guilt, Goulding consented to findings of  sales practice violations in that between April 2000 and June 2001, he effected a total of  ten unauthorized trades in the accounts of two customers.

On appeal, the NYSE Board of Directors reversed the decision of the hearing panel and imposed the penalty agreed to by the parties.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Former Member Firm Disciplined for Financial and Operational Deficiencies and Books and Records Violations
Man Financial Inc., n/k/a Man Securities Inc.
Hearing Board Decision: 05-162
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated  Section 15(c) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  Rule 15c3-3(e)(1) thereunder by creating overdraft in operating account and permitting deposits to be made for special reserve bank account for customers’ exclusive benefit; violated Section 15(c) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 15c3-3(a)(1) thereunder by inaccurately coding non-customer accounts and proprietary accounts of introducing brokers; violated NYSE Rule 342 by failing to supervise Floor clerks and qualifying Floor broker member; violated Section 17(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 17a-3(a)(11) thereunder and NYSE Rule 440 by failing to maintain an accurate customer trial balance; violated Section 17(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 17a-4(a)(5) thereunder and NYSE Rules 440 and 440.20 by failing to maintain formal reconciliations for intercompany accounts and affiliates’ account balances; violated NYSE Rule 401 by failing to (a) identify beneficial owner of certain prime broker accounts, (b) ensure that prime brokers not managed by registered investment advisors were maintaining required minimum net equity, (c) have procedures to identify short sales in prime broker customer accounts, and (d) have procedures to determine whether securities were available prior to effecting short sales in prime broker customer accounts or that securities in question could be borrowed for delivery by settlement date; violated NYSE Rule 431(f)(8)(B) by employing improper formula to determine day-trading margin calls; violated NYSE Rule 132 by submitting inaccurate account type indicators – Consent to censure and $100,000 fine.
Case Summary
Man Financial Inc., n/k/a Man Securities Inc. of Chicago, IL, a former Exchange member firm, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of financial and operational deficiencies and books and records violations.
  • During the year 2002, the firm permitted deposits for its special reserve bank account for the exclusive benefit of customers to be made by creating an overdraft in an operating account, inaccurately coded non-customer accounts and proprietary accounts of introducing brokers, failed to supervise its five Floor clerks and its qualifying Floor member, did not ensure that its customer trial balance was accurate, failed to maintain formal reconciliations and account balances for some of the firm’s affiliates, did not identify the beneficial owners of certain prime broker accounts, did not ensure that its prime broker accounts maintained the minimum net equity, failed to have procedures to determine whether securities were available prior to effecting short sales in its prime broker accounts or that the firm could borrow the securities for delivery by the settlement date, failed to have policies and procedures that allowed the firm to accurately calculate customers’ day trading margin requirements and submitted inaccurate account type indicators.

The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure and a $100,000 fine.  The firm consented to the penalty.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Member Firm Disciplined for Financial and Operational Deficiencies
Banc of America Securities LLC
Hearing Board Decision: 05-161
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated Rule 15c3-3 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to properly calculate proprietary account for introducing brokers and customer reserve computations; violated Rule 15c3-1 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to properly compute net capital; violated Rule 17a-5 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by filing inaccurate financial and operational combined uniform single reports; violated NYSE Rules 342(a) and (b) by failing to provide for appropriate procedures of supervision and control and to establish a system of follow-up and review to prevent foregoing violations – Consent to censure and $60,000 fine.
Case Summary
Banc of America Securities LLC, of Charlotte, NC, an Exchange member firm, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of financial and operational deficiencies.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that during August and September 2002, the member firm failed to properly allocate certain credits in its proprietary account for introducing brokers, failed to properly calculate its Customer Reserve Formula computations and Net Capital computations, filed an inaccurate FOCUS report, and failed to provide for appropriate supervisory systems and procedures with respect to these activities.   

The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure and a $60,000 fine.  The firm consented to the penalty.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Disciplined for Trading Violations
Michael Punturieri
Hearing Board Decision: 05-137
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated Exchange Rule 476(a)(6) by entering off-market-priced trades with third party that exposed member firm organization to losses; caused violations of Exchange Rules 78 and 476(a)(8) by effecting reciprocal trades with third party that involved no beneficial change in ownership; caused violations of Exchange Rule 440 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Act by back-dating transactions with third party, entering fictitious trade “cancellations” and “corrections” for purpose of advancing settlement date of such trades and omitting entry of transactions from front-office trade entry system – Consent to censure, four-month bar, concurrent two-year bar from functioning as registered securities trader, $10,000 fine and undertaking to cooperate with Enforcement.
Case Summary
Michael Punturieri of Massapequa Park, NY, a former registered representative, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of trading violations.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that during the period from February to July 2002, Punturieri engaged in conduct inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade in violation of NYSE Rule 476(a)(6) and caused violations of NYSE Rules 78 and 476(a)(8) by engaging in “parking” transactions with a third party that involved no beneficial change in ownership and by engaging in off-market-priced trades.  Punturieri was directed to enter certain trades with a third party into the member firm’s trade data systems in a manner that caused the member firm’s books and records to be inaccurate in violation of NYSE Rule 440 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the 1934 Act.

The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure, a four-month bar, concurrent two-year bar from functioning as a registered securities trader, $10,000 fine and an undertaking to cooperation with the NYSE.  Punturieri consented to the penalty. 

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Disciplined for Trading Violations
Patrick Scheideler
Hearing Board Decision: 05-135
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated Exchange Rule 476(a)(6) by entering off-market-priced trades with third party that exposed member firm organization to losses; caused violations of Exchange Rules 78 and 476(a)(8) by engaging in prearranged trades with third party involving offer to sell, coupled with offer to buy back at same or at advanced price; caused violations of Exchange Rule 476(a)(8) by engaging in fictitious bid, offer or transaction and/or knowingly executing order for purchase or sale of securities which would involve no change of beneficial ownership; and caused violations of Exchange Rule 440 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by causing transactions with third party to be back-dated, causing fictitious trade “cancellations” and “corrections” to be entered for purpose of advancing settlement date of such trades and causing transactions to be omitted from  firm’s front-office trade entry system – Consent to censure and three-year bar.
Case Summary
Patrick Scheideler of Hoboken, NJ, a former registered representative, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of trading violations.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that from February to July 2002, Scheideler engaged in “parking” transactions with a third party that involved no beneficial change in ownership and in off-market-priced trading.   Scheideler also entered certain trades with a third party into the member firm’s trade-data systems in a manner that caused the member firm’s books and records to be inaccurate.
The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure and a three-year bar.  Scheideler consented to the penalty. 
View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Disciplined for Trading Violations
Joseph George
Hearing Board Decision: 05-136
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated Exchange Rule 476(a)(6) by entering off-market-priced trades with  third party that exposed firm to losses; caused violations of Exchange Rules 78 and 476(a)(8) by effecting reciprocal trades with third party that involved no beneficial change in ownership; caused violations of Exchange Rule 440 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by entering certain trades “as of” a date prior to when such trades were effected and omitting trades in firm’s front-office trade entry system to conceal improper trades and losses; and caused violation of Exchange Rule 345(a) by performing duties customarily performed by registered representative without first being registered with Exchange – Consent to censure, eighteen-month bar, undertaking to cooperate with Enforcement, and $5,000 fine reduced to censure, eighteen-month bar and undertaking to cooperate with Enforcement.
Case Summary
Joseph George of Hicksville, NY,  a former non-registered employee, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of trading violations.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that during the period February to July 2002, George engaged in conduct inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade in violation of NYSE Rule 476(a)(6) and caused violations of NYSE Rules 78 and 476(a)(8) by engaging in “parking” transactions with a third party that involved no beneficial change in ownership, and by engaging in off-market-priced trades.  George was directed to enter certain trades with a third party into the member firm’s trade data systems in a manner that caused the member firm’s books and records to be inaccurate in violation of NYSE Rule 440 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the 1934 Act.
  • In addition, George caused a violation of NYSE Rule 345(a) by performing duties customarily performed by a registered representative without first being registered with, qualified by and found acceptable to the NYSE.

The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure, eighteen-month bar and an undertaking to cooperate with the NYSE. 

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Disciplined for Failure to Disclose Criminal History and Failure to Cooperate
Catherine Regina Barningham
Hearing Board Decision: 05-101
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Failed to disclose, on an employment application, her prior criminal history; and violated Exchange Rule 477 in that she failed to comply with or respond to an Exchange request that she provide information and testimony – Censure and three-year bar.
Case Summary
Catherine Regina Barningham of Phoenix, AZ, a former non-registered employee, was found guilty of failing to disclose her prior criminal history and failing to cooperate in an investigation by the NYSE Division of Enforcement.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that during December 2003, Barningham failed to disclose her prior criminal history on employment application submitted to her member organization employer.
  • In addition, Barningham failed to comply with or respond to one or more written requests by the NYSE for information and failed to comply with or respond to a request by the NYSE to provide testimony concerning one or more matters that occurred prior to the termination of her status as a non-registered employee of a member organization. 

The NYSE imposed a penalty on Barningham of a censure and a three-year bar.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Disciplined for Failure to Disclose Criminal History and Failure to Cooperate
Ari J. Lefauve
Hearing Board Decision: 05-102
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Failed to disclose a prior criminal conviction on an employment application to his member organization employer; and violated Exchange Rule 477 in that he failed to respond in a timely manner to Exchange requests for a written statement – Consent to censure and bar for one year and nine months.
Case Summary
Ari J. Lefauve of Brooklyn, NY, a former non-registered employee, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings of failing to disclose a prior criminal conviction and failing to cooperate in an investigation by the NYSE Division of Enforcement.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that, during April 2004, in connection with his employment with a member firm organization, Lefauve failed to disclose a prior criminal conviction on an employment application that he submitted.
  • In addition, Lefauve failed to timely comply with NYSE requests that he submit a written explanation regarding why he failed to disclose his prior criminal conviction on his employment application.

The NYSE imposed a penalty on Lefauve of a censure and a one year and nine months bar.  Lefauve consented to the penalty.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Barred for Failure to Cooperate
Brian D. Stocker
Hearing Board Decision: 05-103
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Failed to comply with Exchange requests for information and testimony – Censure and bar until he complies, to become permanent if Respondent does not comply within three months.
Case Summary
Brian D. Stocker of Louisville, KY, a former registered representative, was found guilty of failing to cooperate in an investigation by the NYSE Division of Enforcement.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that Stocker failed to comply with or respond to NYSE requests for information and testimony regarding certain matters which occurred prior to the termination of his employment with a member organization.

The NYSE imposed a penalty on Stocker of a censure and a bar until he complies with the NYSE's request, the bar to become permanent if he does not comply within three months.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Disciplined for Failure to Disclose Criminal History
Clara Meyer Rosenkranz
Hearing Board Decision: 05-127
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Failed to disclose on employment application submitted to member firm employer a criminal conviction that rendered Respondent subject to statutory disqualification– Consent to censure and twelve-month bar.
Case Summary
Clara Meyer Rosenkranz of Brenham, TX, a former non-registered employee, consented without admitting or denying guilt to findings that she failed to disclose her prior criminal history.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that in June 2004, Rosenkranz failed to disclose on an employment application submitted to her member firm employer, one or more prior criminal matters, including a criminal conviction that rendered her subject to a statutory disqualification.

The NYSE imposed a penalty of a censure and a twelve-month bar.  Rosenkranz consented to the penalty.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back
Individual Barred for Failure to Cooperate
Lee Robert Fleischman
Hearing Board Decision: 05-114
08 Feb 2006
Summary Back to Top
Case Note
Violated NYSE Rule 477 by failing to comply with request to appear and testify regarding matters that occurred prior to termination of employment with member organization – Censure and temporary bar, to become permanent if Respondent does not comply within three months.
Case Summary
Lee Robert Fleischman of Stamford, CT, a former registered representative, was found guilty of failing to cooperate in an investigation by the NYSE Division of Enforcement.
  • An NYSE hearing panel found that Fleischman failed to comply with a NYSE request to appear and testify regarding certain matters which occurred prior to the termination of his employment with a member organization.

The NYSE imposed a penalty on Fleischman of a censure and a bar until he complies with the NYSE's request, the bar to become permanent if he does not comply within three months.

View Text of Disciplinary Decision (pdf)
back